Tag: Retention

How to Retain Your Employees

November 3rd, 2008

A few months ago, I was approached by Peter Fretty, an author with Business Connect, to discuss employee retention tools employers can take advantage of.

I shared a few things with him which I am glad to say were published in this month’s magazine along with some other good, insightful thoughts from both local and national employers.

If you don’t receive Business Connect Magazine (which I strongly recommend), you can read Peter’s article online here: How to Retain Your Employees.

Just for fun, I’ve listed the more verbose responses to some of what Fretty asked me:

What do you see as the most effective means of retaining employees?

The most-common reason people leave their jobs is because they don’t like their boss. This takes on a lot of forms from not feeling challenged, to feeling micromanaged, passed over for opportunities, or not being trained well. It’s regular for new managers to completely change over much of their staff within a year after they take a new post, generally because of these personality factors.

It’s not about the money, it’s not benefits, it’s not getting a shiny car for being employee of the year like Doba did last year*. At the end of the day, the employee’s direct supervisior has more power and ability to help and employee feel liked and encouraged or disgruntled and dissatisfied than any other thing a company can do.

We all know that the cream rise to the top, and in business, the superstar talent will always keep their eyes and ears open through active and passive networking. Even the least-talkative or outgoing employee likes to work where they feel liked and appreciated, and even they will seek new opportunities when they feel their relationship with their direct supervisor is strained. Superstars are savvy enough to not complain about their boss around other people, but they will sing their praises, and your company’s, if they like what they’re doing, and they feel satisfied with their job.

That being said, the best boss in the world will lose employees hand-over-fist if the company is not:

  • Paying well (by the way, which means ahead of the curve, not right at the median pay-range),
  • Doesn’t provide adequate (read: liberal quantities of) tools to help employees succeed at their jobs
  • Misses opportunities to praise and reward employees for the hard work they do (recognition is more important than money, but money talks very loudly).
  • Provide all of the required and some over-the-top benefits to make sure their employees (and their families) feel appreciated as more than cogs in the machine.

What mistakes do people commonly make when trying to keep employees?

  1. Hire the wrong bosses.
    People are promoted to management for the worst reasons. They look the part, they have the right degree, or they’ve been there the longest. Just like a brilliant doctor without any bedside manner, the most accomplished, credentialed, superstar manager will fail miserably if she can’t incite enthusiasm and success in her employees.
  2. Don’t give bosses tools for retention.
    Corporate policies always play their heavy hand when employees want flex time, or to try out a special project, or even take an extra day of vacation to see their kid’s last soccer game of the year. Google’s 20% rule, where employees get one day a week to work on any approved project of their choosing has produced some of their best creations. Why not?  This is much better use of “water cooler” time anyway, isn’t it?
  3. Don’t ask people what they want to do next.
    People will jump companies in a heartbeat for new challenges. Companies are usually horrible at actually helping people accelerate through their careers internally. Challenge them, ask them for help with special projects, allow them to be creative and try new things with your blessing.
  4. Pay exactly the “market rate”.
    Duh. This one is easy to fix, but hard to approve through management. Yes, employee costs are high. But replacing an employee costs up to 70% of that employee’s annual salary. It’s your choice: You can lose them every 8-16 months (current averages for non-executive transitions), or you can pay them an extra 10% or even 30% over the market, with regular, meaningful raises.
  5. Stifle creativity by maintaining the status-quo.
    Doing more of the same, but hoping for something different is the definition of insanity. People will either go insane or go somewhere else if you don’t allow them to have input to your processes and take on difficult projects. Toyota championed this, allowing any factory line worker to stop the whole plant if they saw something that needed to change.
  6. Don’t Talk.
    The old joke is, if you hear from your CEO more on CNN than in your own business, there’s something wrong (See GBAT #16).  Maybe your CEO isn’t ever on CNN, but this is the age of transparency, and if your employees don’t know what’s really going on behind the brass-handled doors of the C-suite, they will go elsewhere.
  7. Don’t Listen.
    Gatekeepers, assistants, and other executives are great at keeping the bad news and feedback from getting to the top. That’s bad. Engage in conversations. Real, honest, and serious ones. Your staff will respect you for listening, and likely respect you even more when you recognize where you’re wrong, admit it publicly, champion the better ideas, and make sure you always pass credit where it’s due. Likely, when people know that if they talk to you, you will act… they will make sure they only talk to you about really crucial things in the first place! P.S. If your employees blog, comment on them!
  8. Don’t Relax.
    Companies that let their hair down once in a while and do something fun–take your employees to the premier of a new movie, send them to lagoon for a day, host a staff retreat that’s actually about retreating–will retain employees longer because people will like working there.  Do something once a quarter… maybe two smaller events and two significant onces. Make them memorable, fun, and for everyone.

* Don’t get me wrong, Doba did an AMAZING thing by doing this, but not everyone can/should.  I’d be open to it, personally though…

Popularity: 46% [?]

Calendar: Personal Branding Summit – Free Nov. 8 2007

November 6th, 2007

Got a phone?

Get registered for an incredible Personal Branding teleconference happening Thursday (two days from when I am writing this) and includes an incredible lineup of speakers from all over the world.

This conference is FREE, but you must register, and then get on the phone during the section you want to learn.

From the website:

To mark the 10th Anniversary of personal branding, on November 8th we are providing 24 free teleseminars with experts in the field of personal branding. Anyone in the world with a telephone will be able to participate in this live event.

This event has content streams for career success, entrepreneurial success and talent management. So, whether you are a corporate professional, an entrepreneur, or a HR manager challenged with the need to attract and retain great people, you will take away actionable knowledge from attending.

Check out the Speakers and Panelists which includes Utah entrepreneur and job-seeker advocate Jason Alba.

Popularity: 34% [?]

Utah Unemployment Death-Grip Loosening?

October 11th, 2007

Wow, what an amazing year this has been. The very tight unemployment rate seems to finally be seeing a little light with some well-known Utah companies laying off employees, other movement of employees from company to company still strong, and the relative salaries being paid seeming to stabilize instead of the spiraling out-of-control, even excessive salary jumps that I’ve witnessed this summer.

Of course, one never wants to look a gift-horse in the mouth… and while I’ve enjoyed the incredible economy, and I don’t really want to see things loosen up a bit, I have also been affected in that I’ve been unfortunately less successful in recruiting for some would-be pleased clients, if the economy had just a few more qualified people available to recruit. Here’s to hoping we don’t slide too far down this slippery slope!

Popularity: 26% [?]

Clock Building, Not Time-Telling

August 21st, 2007

Relevant to my post last week about things to change in the Recruiting industry, I am reminded of a concept in “Good to Great” and “Built to Last” discussing how to build greatness that lasts:

Clock Building, Not Time-Telling

Of course, it sounds simple on the surface (all good philosophical phrases are) but their implications are far deeper. What’s the difference? Well, Built To Last says it like this:

Built to Last by Jim Collins, Jerry I. Porras“Imagine you met a remarkable person who could look at the sun or stars at any time of day or night and state the exact time and date: ‘It’s April 23, 1401, 2:36AM and 12 seconds.’ This person would be an amazing time teller, and we’d probably revere that person for the ability to tell time. But wouldn’t that person be even more amazing if, instead of telling the time, he or she built a clock that could tell the time forever, even after he or she was dead and gone.”

- James C. Collins and Jerry I. Porras,
Chapter 2: “Clock Building, Not Time Telling”, Built to Last

So, what are you doing in your organization and in your life that’s TIME-TELLING, but not CLOCK-BUILDING?

Kaushal Kurapati says it like this: “From my work experience I have noted that giving people the freedom to fail and supporting their decisions–after scrutiny–even when they fail is a way to generate trust and delegate responsibility. Leaders who criticize folks in the company for failing just because they (leaders) weren’t involved is a sure shot way to incorporate time telling into the organization.”


Employeescreen IQ provides background checks to employers globally.

Popularity: 26% [?]

Bozofication Alive and Well: Utah Companies Will Pay for Stupidity

June 27th, 2007

UPDATE: Please leave comments about BOZO things you have experienced at your or other companies! Anonymous submissions OK

Dilbert DeamonsI hate to say it, but I am seeing some of the most foolish and downright stupid things coming from Utah companies these days. These things may not be approaching the Yee-Haw ‘Bozofication’ problems that Guy Kawasaki ranted about from his blog-base in Silicon Valley, but there are some wildly dumb things going on out there.

According to the Utah Department of Workforce Services, May 2007′s unemployment rate is 2.5%, where the national rate is currently 4.5%. BYU’s Newsnet validates the data with their recent article, More Jobs … Less Money: Utah Unemployment Rate at 2.4%.

Corporate DroneWith such unprecedented job-growth and such a freakishly tight labor market (I have interviewed three people this week who “just up and moved here” knowing they would get a job), you would think companies in the area would be tripping over themselves to train and retain the talent they have, knowing that it costs up to 80% of an employees annual salary in recruiting fees and lost productivity to replace an employee once they go.

But, no.

In fact, as I see the market tighten, companies seem to be getting stupider and stupider with their retention systems. In fact, they may as well be paying their employees to leave, rolling out the red carpet for them, and tossing in a trip for them and the fam to Disney Land while they’re at it.

Here are five things that have consistently surfaced in my interviews over the past few weeks when I ask, “Why are you looking to leave your current job.”

  1. R-E-S-P-E-C-T: “I am continually being micro-managed. I have been doing this for 15 years. I think I know what I am doing. But, my boss is new, and I think they’re trying to look good. Now, I have them to manage as well as the rest of my job. “
  2. INTEGRITY: “I was told in my annual review that I would get a raise. That was January. This is almost July. I haven’t received a cent.”
  3. PAY: “I have been getting fed the line that ‘Utah County is Different’ for seven years. I don’t believe it any more. My living expenses are just as much here as anybody I know in Salt Lake County, and I am earning $15K less than people doing my same job, for smaller companies, with less responsibility.”
  4. INSULT TO INJURY: “I am already underpaid by $10K for the same job in Salt Lake. I was told to hang on through the rest of the year and I’d get ‘taken care of’. They gave me a raise of 14 cents per hour over last year. You’ve gotta be kidding me. That’s not even worth my time.”
  5. HONESTY: “They promised to pay my tuition if I went to school and got my degree. Their only stipulation was that I had to pay for it, then they would pay me back when I graduated. I thought that was dumb, but I did it. Now, I’ve graduated, and when I turned in my bills, they told me that ‘the policy just changed’ and they don’t do tuition reimbursement anymore.”

At the end of the day, the trend I am seeing simply stems from BAD MANAGEMENT. I wonder if the tight labor market is actually exposing fissures in the infrastructure of these companies to the point that they are letting any Tom, Jane or Harry run the place?

If you are caught working for any of these companies, I would RUN, not walk to your favorite recruiter or job-board and doggedly search for the next opportunity for yourself… or you may be the last comic standing when the walls come tumblin’ down… and it will surely not be funny.

Related Items:


EmployeescreenIQ provides background checks to employers globally.

Popularity: 33% [?]

FYI: Your Compensation Model Sucks

May 15th, 2007

Nobody questions that most businesses exist to serve the business owners, and to generate profits. Hopefully, they’ll do some great stuff for their customers and communities along the way. But, it’s my loud-mouthed opinion that most companies do a really lousy job of really compensating their key employees, and simultaneously “helping” poor-performers move along little doggies.

So, when Dawn Turner reports that an Executive Assistant Gets $152,000 Bonus for Creative Problem Solving, my ears perk up.

  • How could you reward and promote key attitudes and values that would benefit your company culture?
  • How can top-achievers receive truly incredible compensation, naturally, through them performing their jobs?

Now, Good to Great teaches that it’s not how you pay, it’s who, and I must agree with that. No compensation plan will get deadbeats to perform like athletes. But, when you combine the right people, and the right business focus with truly innovative compensation models that reward top achievement, you will have a perfect storm of reasons why your company will attract and retain the sharpest and best people for your industry and niche.

The other shoe? The following will kill your attempts and good compensation and make it suck even more:

  • Your plan takes so long to realize real payout that people either forget about it, or don’t care.
  • Payout is only achieved after so much work that many people feel it’s not worth it.
  • The people already getting “all the pay” are the only ones benefiting from the new pay structure.
  • Your plan is based too much on subjective, changeable rules based on whim and decision rather than verifiable objective results, data, etc. The instant your employee sniffs that they need to be “in the club” to get the payout, your true superstars (aka diamonds in the rough) will flee like rats on the Titanic.
  • Your plan actually creates unintended consequences, like paying stock options out to (hopefully) improve dedication to your company, but instead creates an intense outward-focus on the stock market, and a frenetic push toward short-term gains (the next closing bell) rather than long-term success.

Popularity: 12% [?]

Prediction: University.net — Subscription Model for Colleges and Universities

April 4th, 2007

Revised: 4/4/07 @ 1:34pm MST

I saw a bumper-sticker the other day that said:

“Education is what’s left over when you forgot everything you learned in school.”

I have a problem with that.

There’s no question that, in the flat world, education is becoming as much a commodity as cheap groceries, ipods, tax return services, and even jobs.

Yet, while colleges and universities are getting savvy to online courses and so-called continuing education*, they’re missing the boat, in my opinion, in keeping their graduates more captive, and not just letting them out into the world with nothing more than an annual “give us money” postcard or the occasional “newsletter”, which is actually a slightly-less thinly veiled request for more donations than the postcard (just got one yesterday, btw).

Some schools do a good job of networking among the alumni, get access to alumni databases, job boards, and allowing alumni to keep their email addresses (which is a great branding strategy when your grads go out into the work world), etc… but they don’t do a good job of keeping the alumni learning, and keeping them engaged with resources at the school that will help them further their careers and/or better their communities, etc.

In short, why aren’t schools trying to keep their students “around” for their whole lives, rather than just four quick years, once in their life.

Sure, the college I attended has online courses in things I would be very interested in. My company even would pay my tuition to take those classes. I have even gone online to sign up a few times.

But, something about the process is obviously too hard… or I *would* have done it by now.
What about a monthly subscription model for alumni from schools? Instead of asking me for a once a year donation, why not ask me for a monthly subscription?

  • Take a percentage of my fee and invest it into the school of my choice so I feel like I am “giving back”.
    • Take some of the burden off full-time student tuition with some of that being carried by subscribing alumni.
    • Don’t send me postcards that make me feel guilty. Send me ones that thank me for my continued support!
  • Make it so DROP DEAD EASY for me to actually ENHANCE my education with you that I find myself constantly taking new or refresher courses through your school to improve my life, my community, etc.
    • Maybe with my subscription fee, I get so many “free” credits I can use toward classes every year.
    • Allow me to audit classes drop-dead easy
    • Have someone manage my tuition reimbursement process FOR ME, engaging my company, so I don’t have to.
  • Then, allow me to access premium services that other alumni wouldn’t have:
    • Better selection of sports game tickets or campus amenities.
    • Send me the occasional “U” sweatshirt (in my size, of course) or hat, emblazoned golf-balls or other schwag that I can show off.
    • When life changes happen for me (marriage, baby, etc) send me stuff for my spouse or undergrad-to-be. (Maybe even information on a special college savings fund where you’ll match my donations if my child attends your school?)

The bottom-line? Choosing a university is about wanting to get the education you need to succeed in the future… who wouldn’t want to attend the university that will actually embrace their students for life, and help them succeed no matter what the future holds?
* Which is really a euphemism for “I didn’t finish my education”

Popularity: 11% [?]

Best Place to Work in Utah?

January 11th, 2007

Russ Page wants to know your thoughts on the Best workplace in Utah. Click over there and let thy pontifications flow from thy keyboard.

Popularity: 8% [?]

CIO Insight — Tips for Hiring; Retaining IT Staff

November 27th, 2006

CIO Insight is a great industry magazine which I enjoy regularly online and off. A recent article hit home for me, as a consultant to help companies with their technical recruiting:

Three Experts’ Tips for Hiring, Retaining IT Staffs

When it comes to hiring and retaining IT staffs, the future doesn’t look so bright. The Baby Boomers are getting ready to retire, the number of college students entering computer science has dropped 50 percent in the last five years, according to the Computer Research Association, and the need for corporate IT people is growing.

In the article, they bring three expert opinions together on hiring and retention for IT personnel. They surround three areas:

Another excellent article you should read here (more of an overall analysis of the talent-management issue) is the cover article for CIO Insight’s October 2006 edition: “Attracting IT Talent: The Human Factor

Oh, and do you know the three things IT professionals want beside more money?


Search call center jobs at Jobs In Call Centers.com.

Popularity: 9% [?]