Recruiting Industry

EnticeLabs Receives $2 Million from First Advantage and Omniture Founders

September 28th, 2009

Enticelabs-logoWelcome news to the ears of the great team at EnticeLabs, First Advantage and Omniture’s founders Josh James and John Pestana have chipped in $2 Million in funding to add to the $1.3 Million the Provo, Utah startup has already received in the past. Techcrunch broke the news earlier today.

Over the past few years, the company has been developing the TalentSeekr recruiting engine, which proactively helps companies place targeted recruitment advertising in front of specific candidates that fit a reasonable set of criteria, determined within milliseconds by the EnticeLabs servers.

In May, Ryan Probasco and Grant Gordon appeared on the Couchcast show I host to talk about the technology.

Way to go, team!

Transparency: I am loosely affiliated with EnticeLabs.

Popularity: 5% [?]

72% of Orgs Do Not Recruit With Social Media

September 3rd, 2009

The sample size can’t be representative of all orgs, but Smartblog on Workforce polled their readers and found 72% of them do not recruit using social media tools.

Also, 43% of respondents couldn’t care less, thank you.

72% of companies polled do not use social media to recruit

72% of companies polled do not use social media to recruit

What innovative ways is your company recruiting? (or… not?)

IMG from CollegeRecruiter.com

Popularity: 3% [?]

Google to Close Phoenix Office; Bloggers Fire Back: Contribute or Die

September 22nd, 2008

The official Google Blog noted Friday that Google will be shutting down their Phoenix, Arizona office in November.

We opened our Phoenix office in 2006 and hoped that it would develop to support many of our internal engineering projects, the systems that make Google, well, Google. But we’ve found that despite everyone’s best efforts, the projects our engineers have been working on in Arizona have been, and remain, highly fragmented. So after a lot of soul searching we have decided to incorporate work on these projects into teams elsewhere at Google. We will therefore be closing our Arizona office on November 21, 2008.

Tirana Magazine adds that “The office opened in 2006 on the campus of Arizona State University in Tempe, just south of Phoenix.” and “The closure is the latest of several: the company announced plans in July to close offices in Denver and Dallas.”

Startup Meme, among others wishes the Phoenix Googlers well, but what really caught my eye was this wry I-told-you-so-ish comment from Daily Hoopla:

“Google made the decision to put their campus on the Arizona State University campus nearly two and half years ago.  …. Clearly, Google was in it for Google, not the university and not the city.  Ask yourself, have you seen Google at local technical events?  Have you seen them contribute anything beyond job solicitations?  Google while we love you, we are disappointed you didn’t make it work.  I think your approach here was all wrong.  The next time you come into a community remember you receive in accordance to what you give.”

I like his clarity, and his comment. Maybe a little bitterness, but it makes a lot of sense… if you’re trying to tap into a technical community, then you need to GIVE to that technical community!

Popularity: 34% [?]

4 Factors Creating Utah Workforce Funk

July 7th, 2008

There’s no question something interesting is happening with Utah’s professional/technical workforce right now, and I think there are no less than four competing factors at play any business-owner should be paying very close attention to:

  1. Real and Wage Inflation
  2. Intense Competition for Talent
  3. Corporate cost-cutting
  4. High Energy/Commute Costs

The hardest part to pin-down is that the economic indicators show a market that is schizophrenic. Utah’s high tech job market is part recessionary and part booming. There’s both signs of weakness, but signs of boom-cycle madness.

If there were ever a time to unveil the invisible hand and see what’s really going to happen to this economy over the next six-12 months, now is the time… those who navigate this juncture well stand to gain a lot of opportunity, while these massive icebergs of clashing forces might very well crush entire sections of our economy and workforce if we’re not paying close attention.

Real and Wage Inflation

The Fed won’t admit there’s inflation yet, even though everyone else is worried about it… but one trip to the grocery store tells you a dollar doesn’t go as far these days. This plays into issues 3 and 4, and is the driver for issue 2.

Bottom-line: If the same amount of money you made last year isn’t cutting it, talented people will demand higher wages for the same jobs they were doing a year ago.

If the company they currently work for won’t pay up, no problem, they’ll just move.

Intense Competition for Talent

As a recruiter, I use every tool I can find. The job boards, these days, are as silent and un-exciting as a Hillary Clinton rally in Payson. The war for top-talent has moved from remote, tactical operations using unmanned email probes and remote-controlled resume submittal to (continuing the analogy) hand-to-hand, street fighting. Candidates are being approached at every angle, from every recruiter, in very creative ways…. and they’re getting hired, too!

At the Blogger Dinner last Thursday, Steve Spencer quipped something like: This is just like the late 90s. It doesn’t matter if you can actually do any of the stuff on your resume, but if you have the right acronyms, you’re hired!

(And, yes, Steve’s company is hiring… tell ‘em I sent ya)

Corporate Cost-Cutting

Client after client of mine has issued cost-cutting warnings. Several more companies are putting in-place hiring freezes, readjusting their priorities, laying people off or closing down all together.

This hyper-sensitive focus on costs can be unacceptable to a workforce already in high-demand.

One jobseeker for a Salt Lake-based IT Outsourcing firm told me last Thursday that his current employer has”implemented a new performance-based pay plan where you get a “very low base wage” and, if you hit certain quotas every day, you will get paid more.

The story goes that these employees, if they are industrious little busy bees, can earn even more than they have been making, but the employees don’t quite see it that way.

    “Its a joke,” my jobseeker friend told me. “I’ve done the math. It is impossible to make anything close to what I have been making. I am outta here.”

There’s bound to be losses when a company needs to refocus. A recent article by Tiffany Hsu in the Baltimore Sun explains this very well:

    “It costs a lot to let someone go,” said Don McNamara, president of Heritage Associates Inc., a management consultant company based in Laguna Niguel, Calif. “So we’ve got to circle the wagons and pull in a little bit.”

    Businesses, he said, can cross-train employees in multiple roles to boost productivity and restructure to remove inefficiencies…. but employers can’t cut too many expenses and perks without risking driving workers away.

    “You’ve got to be sensitive to your people and make sure morale isn’t one of the things you cut,” McNamara said. “If this comes as a surprise to them, they might be tempted to update their resumes at another company.”

High Energy/Commute Costs

Even thinking about high gas/energy prices makes me exhausted, but the simple fact is we are receiving regular calls and updates from our candidates seeking more commute-friendly work options, telecomuting, shorter commutes, or other benefits to offset the incredible rise in fuel costs this last year has seen. For once, the State has taken a lead here, generating (I predict) pressure on many new fronts to allow employees to have more control over when, where and how much they work.

On the flip-side, a lot of people who otherwise want to keep their current job are interested right now in part-time, flexible, contract-based work options too. That is an unforeseen consequence of these higher prices.

Summary

At the end of the day, companies are asking their employees to do more with less, while these same high-demand employees are not afraid of feeling out their options and making a more lucrative move if needed.

I fear, for companies too cost-conscious, this will become a race to mediocrity unless they very creatively examine their work demands, and be very open and honest with their employees. Find out what they need/want and even while cutting costs, you can make work fun and, heck, maybe even more productive.

Popularity: 45% [?]

Where are the Girl Geeks for the Tech Jobs?

May 3rd, 2008

A few days ago, I was part of an interesting conversation. I had a lunch meeting with three managers of a department for one of my clients. One (male) had just completed several first-round interviews with candidates I had provided. Another manager (female) asked him a very simple, but awkward question:

How many girls did you hire?

Of course, I chimed in quickly that our candidates are selected solely on skill-match, qualifications, education and relevant experience and NOT on their gender… which is the truth.

However, a few days later that comment is ringing in my head.

Its not that I have never recruited a woman to fill a job… we do it a lot… but there is no denying it that, if I was to take a look at the gender of my candidates, most of them are male. Of course, I don’t TRACK that sort of thing in my office.

Also, my company is likely one of the most fair/balance organizations I’ve ever worked for in terms of men/women employees…

About a month ago, Gizmodo published a story reporting that Girl Geeks are “On the Rise

the male-dominated era of technology and gadgets may be coming to an end. Some activities, such as using a DVR to record a TV show, or streaming movies or games, are more popular amongst women than men.

But, when it comes to filling technical jobs with a balanced number of male/female candidates, where ARE the girl geeks?

I have a few theories:

  • My recruiting processes are structured in such a way that our jobs are just not interesting to female applicants?
  • Girl Geeks have secret clubs that they tell nobody about… and they share their jobs with each other only.
  • Girl Geeks have a drive and purpose that is different than the current bulk of candidates I work with. It appears that many professional women I know have a strong entrepreneurial “I can do it myself” streak… maybe “workin’ for da man” (pun only half-way intended) is even LESS interesting to women?

Please comment, below… especially if you are a girl-geek and you have some insight for me?  I would especially like to know if, as a woman, you feel the existing job-search “system” out there is unfair to you, and why…

Popularity: 16% [?]

LinkedIN Mobile Version now Available

March 20th, 2008

I’ve got to say I like what LinkedIn has done lately… cool new features, a facelift and now, access to their systems via mobile phones:

[Announcing] LinkedIn mobile for any Web enabled wireless phones that use the wireless application protocol (WAP). What that allows you to do is access LinkedIn from any mobile device ranging from your Blackberry to iPhone

http://m.linkedin.com/

Check out LinkedIn’s corporate blog post on the subject, including some cool videos. Check it out. It’s been three years since I called LinkedIN out abut missing the boat.  SO MUCH has changed in this marketspace, since then, but I’m glad to see they’re making good progress.

Popularity: 28% [?]

Jobs for (Steve) Jobs

March 13th, 2008

Twitter friend @jeffnorris of iSCI FI sent me a bitstrip toon he made concerning job-hunters and the recruiters they love to hate.

Check it.

Popularity: 33% [?]

How much is the state of the economy a result of media hype?

March 8th, 2008

Kiley Newbold, fellow blogger and colleague, asked the following question on LinkedIn:

How much is the state of the economy (I.E. the alleged impending recession) a result of media hype?

I am convinced the media plays a major role in stimulating or slowing the economy. Please share your thoughts on this. To what extent will the media hype (and the public reaction) be responsible if the US enters an official recession?

To which I replied…

Recession is part of the pie. You can NOT have expansion without recession. They are forever linked. Like the waves of the ocean–you can not have a high without a low. Like the old song says, “Baby… that’s just the way it is, baby.”

A few things to consider:

  • Contrary to popular opinion, that somehow “the Fed” or the President’s Economic Policy has something to do with the recession, there has been a recession in the United States of America EVERY SIX YEARS since 1776, except for the period between 1990 and 2000. That was the longest economic expansion in history, blamed mostly on the Internet’s ability to radically reduce cost and spread resources to the most-efficient markets.

    What the government CAN do is try to prevent a deep recession, a depression, and control inflation… but there will always, always, always be corrections and recessions.

  •  This last period of economic expansion officially started in 2001-2002. Forward six years and you have THIS YEAR. We’re DUE.
  • Except for one outlier (1990-2000), statistics prove that recessions are normal, recurring and important to the general economic health of a country. The GDP has always been HIGHER at the high-point of the NEXT expansion than the last, so we’re always growing. And, other than the Great Depression, the trough of the recession has not really ever been AS BAD as the recession before.
  • Finally, there has never been a recession in an election year before. If a recession does hit this year, it will cause incredible stress on the candidates when all the OTHER issues will take a backseat to the one issue: MY MONEY. Get a good seat. This will be a good one to watch.

Besides, when has the news or the media really EVER been out in front of a trend. They don’t care about creating anything…. they only want EYEBALLS watching their program, so they will scour all the possible stories to find the one story just ghastly enough to get people to “tune in at 11″ and find out

Popularity: 34% [?]

About My Company

February 4th, 2008

Note: I wrote this post while I worked for SOS Technical. I don’t work there anymore. I run my own recruiting agency now called M|REC (Merrill Recruiting). I still recruit, but now I do it even more awesomely than before. I can help your company suck less at recruiting, too. This post is here for archival purposes, but please know I am not on their payroll any longer. Thanks!

Last week, I traveled to Albuquerque, New Mexico as part of a recruiting event in partnership with DBM, a global outplacement firm.

While I was there, I presented some information to a great group of people about who SOS Technical (my employer) is, and what our services are. I felt it would be good to archive this information for others to have, so I’ve uploaded my presentation in PDF and PowerPoint format for your viewing and sharing pleasure.

Below is a map of the current locations of SOS Staffing’s family of companies (including 8 strictly “SOS Technical” location)

SOS Staffing Services Map

(Please note that SOS Technical, its other divisions or parents, assumes no responsibility for this blog or any of its content)

Popularity: 54% [?]

Advice for Wannabe Recruiters

January 25th, 2008

A colleague new to my company sent me a nice note asking about what words of wisdom I might have. I don’t know about that, but if you’re starting out or considering recruiting, here’s my advice:

Start with Heart:

Yeah, this sounds so Pollyanna, but think about how much a career means to a person. Their definition of themselves, their relationships with others, and their self-esteem, largely are a function of how they feel about their job. If you don’t LOVE the chance you have every day to change someone’s WHOLE LIFE, you either need to change your focus, or change jobs.

Don’t be in recruiting if you don’t love it. You will permanently hurt yourself and others along the way.


Fake it Till You Make it:

There’s no room “on stage” for tears or fear. Smile. Take responsibility. Arrive first, leave last. Say thank you. Work out often. Volunteer in your offtime for spiritual and emotional renewal. Read books or listen to audiobooks on personal development. Spend ZERO energy on problems out of your control (like anything on the news). Define your own future and make it happen.

“The Bigger the Problem, the Bigger the Check” (Mark Hughes).

The trials we face daily are the makings of the opportunities we’ll be grateful for tomorrow.

Good Luck! Be true, work hard, and you’ll be fine. 

Popularity: 40% [?]